A- de 2016
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Gabriel Eduardo Mendoza Martelo
✓Claimant Danil Roman Velandia Rojas Y Otro
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Se confirma en su integridad el auto recurrido
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Recurso de súplica formulado contra el auto de rechazo de la demanda de inconstitucionalidad de la referencia.
La Sala Plena de la Corporación decidió CONFIRMAR en su integridad el proveído recurrido, en tanto sus fundamentos jurídicos presentan pleno arraigo constitucional, están puestos en razón y se ajustan a derecho.
Además, porque los peticionarios no controvirtieron las razones del rechazo.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- RESUELVE
- CONFIRMAR el auto del 4 de diciembre de 2015 dictado por el Magistrado Sustanciador Luis Guillermo Guerrero Perez, por medio del cual rechazo la demanda, identificada con el numero de radicacion D-11084.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.